Home • Up • Complaints • Governor News and Views • SDP

The School Development Plan.

Where we are going and what we want to do.  It is a living changing document and comments and ideas are always welcomed.

Beatrix Potter Primary School.

School Development Plan 2007 – 2009

Introduction                                                                           Page              

Drawing up the School Improvement Plan                             1                                 

Core Elements                                                                        1                                                                                                             

Mission Statement                                                                  2                                                                                                            

Aims of the School                                                                  2                                                                                                                                   

School Values                                                                         2                                                                                                                                                              

Views of Community and stakeholders SEF 2                       3

Achievement and standards SEF 3                                        4

Personal development and well being SEF 4                         6

Quality teaching and learning SEF 5                                      8

ICT Development                                                                    9

Leadership and management  SEF 6                                    10

Security                                                                                   12

Budget and asset management                                             12

Projects and External Impact                                                 14

 

Introduction.

The school improvement plan is the main policy document for the school.  Governors ensure that it reflects all major aspects of school life, particularly those with cost implications.  It is the document, which influences and directs budget preparation.  It will also influence and link to the school self evaluation format for Ofsted and the school profile.

The process of drawing up the School improvement Plan.

Teaching staff, non-teaching staff, governors and through parents as a result of discussion, survey and parent meetings.

 

CORE ELEMENTS

·         Aims and values

·         Views of the community

·         Achievement and standards

·         Personal development and well being

·         How good is quality of teaching and learning

·         Leadership and management

·         Physical resources

·         Financial resources

·         Projects and external impact

The improvement plan incorporates the headings used in the School Self Evaluation format (SEF)   This allows all the participants to have a common approach and terminology and at the same time allows the school to note improvements, monitor change and to identify areas requiring improvement alongside its SEF document for the LEA and Ofsted.

Governors will review the plan and may add further elements as appropriate. Not all elements of the school improvement plan will be featured, the purpose of the improvement plan is to move the school forward in an effective manner avoiding overload in an all ready packed agenda of educational innovation and change.                                                                    

Mission Statement

 

Beatrix Potter School seeks to provide a high quality education to meet the individual needs of young children in the local community, in partnership with parents.

 

Aims of the school

·         enable all children to fulfill their potential irrespective of ability, sex or ethnic origin

·         promote the spiritual, cultural and moral development of all children

·         develop knowledge and understanding through learning experiences which are appropriate for each child, and which prepare them for the next stage in their education

·         ensure that all children develop a high level of skill, knowledge and understanding in each area of the primary curriculum

·         encourage children to become well behaved, autonomous and responsible members of society

·         monitor, assess and record achievement in a way that will contribute effectively to the planning of the education of each individual child

·         provide an appropriate and stimulating environment equipped with the resources necessary for effective learning

·         assist each child in developing self discipline, self respect, self confidence and respect for others

·         review the effectiveness of the school on a regular basis, building on its strengths and overcoming its weaknesses.

School Values.

Beatrix Potter School values the contribution made to its educational and community activities:

·         by all children, who will be encouraged to fulfill their full potential

·         by all members of staff, who will be encouraged to further their professional development in pursuit of the school’s objectives

·         by all parents, who will be encouraged to develop a working partnership with staff.

The SDP is to the point.  Not every item is costed but the budget reflects the priorities in the plan.  Timescales are defined, they are not set in stone as other influences such as budget changes, national and local initiatives continue to impact on the schools direction and independence.  The plan is realistic and achievable.

 

SEF 2. VIEWS OF LEARNERS, PARENTS/CARERS AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS

What are the views of learners, parents / guardians and other stakeholders and how do you know and feedback?

Gather views;   Questionnaire to Parents.   Questionnaire to Pupils.   Adopt Ofsted Model initially

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

2004 – 2005 Survey     

Completed  July 2005

Analysis of response

Report to parents on outcome Respond where appropriate

Report to Governors  Sept 05

2005 – 2006 Survey     

Pupil questionnaire

Class based

Reaction of pupils to survey

Class based report

Report to Governors

Completed  Nov 2005

 

2006 – 2007 Survey     

Repeat the 04-05 approach

Ofsted model

Level of response compared to 04-05 Analysis response

Consider changes

Consider alternative

Appropriate The type of question in Ofsted .To brief more detail required

Report to parents  Jan 07

Report to governors Jan 07

2008 – 2009 Pupils

Class based questions

Broader questions and detail.

Sept 07 Y6 survey LEA use BP results

Use in SEF

Analysis by class

Outcome & impact        

Changes          

Report to governors

Report to classes

2008-2009 and onwards

Extended services and after school activities.

 

 

Review, use of extended day heads cluster.  Floodlighting bid.  PTA ideas.  Review of current after school clubs.

Pupil participation analysis

Govs Finance sub com and full govs at later date

July 2008

Re-issue parent school agreement.

New Parents pack

Production. Distribution, collection.

Filed in child’s folder.

Business Manager and support.

Costs: Are time to compile survey, print, distribute, collect and collate.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

SEF 3  ACHIEVEMENTS AND STANDARDS

How well do learners achieve?

3a What are learners' achievement and standards in their work?

the standards learners reach as indicated by their test and examination results, taking account of: any significant variations between groups of learners, subjects, courses and key stages; trends over time; comparisons with other schools;   whether learners reach challenging targets; the standards of learners' current work in relation to their learning goals (noting any significant differences between current work and recent results); learners' progress relative to their starting points and capabilities, with any significant variations between groups of learners (making clear whether there are any groups that are underachieving and could be doing better)

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

Foundation profile

Scores and implications

Analysis in light of new target setting 78+ and areas at.

 

SMT Curric sub com

KS1 Sat’s  Ks 2 Optional Sat’s October

Analysis of data

Identify children for targeted support.           

Target groups

Achievement in above areas

Target groups set

All pupils set targets in core

IEP’s SEN children support in place

KS2 Sat’s

Analysis of data From previous year/s

 

SMT

SIP

Curric sub com and later govs

PAT Data, Opt Sat Data, Fisher Data

Analysis of.

Outcome of analysis

Trends

Identify strengths weaknesses of core area

Comparison National and similar schools 

What are the implications.

Determine change, intervention.

National and LEA trends

SMT

Govs

RAISE

Contextual Value added

National Comparisons

School specific data

Ofsted linked

Areas of progress, plateau’s, falls.

 

 

SMT

GOVs

Target Setting and Target Groupings  FLS  ELS

Maths  Other Lit

SENCO

G&T Strand

Individual targets set in core subjects.

 

 

 

Identifying G&T Strand child

Informing parents of targets for pupils How given, verbal at open evenings,.

written in basic format with explanations etc

How needs met in class or elsewhere.

 

Inform parents of target groups.

Assessment Monitoring Policy  updated to reflect any amendments, staff clear on roles, tasks and target groups.  Clear on assessment for learning feedback and info for class

Costs: Are in analysis and reporting on findings.  Time then to compile and move to any response

3b Where relevant: how well do learners achieve in the foundation stage?

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

Foundation Profile

Outcomes

LEA/National comparisons Implications/Issues

Similar to or lower than LEA National trends

Govs

Foundation TLR

Transition to F2 and Transition to KS1

Addressed by teachers.

Change to nat strategy

Areas requiring input identified

Implications

Foundation TLR

More physical, play, creative opportunities across the curriculum..

Improved look for external play

Examine a 10k budget to improve

 

Literacy and Numeracy strategies at F2.

New Nat strategies

Implications new nat startegies

SMT Govs 

Groupings for  Y1, established at end of Summer Term

Improved continuity between Foundation Stage and KS1

Teachers target and group on data available

Teachers

Y1 teacher conferencing with F2 teacher about FSP performance

Improved continuity between Foundation Stage and KS1

As above

As Above

Costs: Budget to implement play area change. (Sept 08 onward)   Analysis and outcome, time in teacher hours.  CPD and advisory input on Nat Strategy and KS1.  Teacher time to discuss and network with colleagues. Teacher Training budget £3000.                                                          

3c On the basis of your evaluation, what are your key priorities for development.

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

September 2007 onwards

Implement new lit strategy

Numeracy Sept 08

Take current practice and blend with new.

Phonics at FS and KS1

Staff training teaching and non teaching 

Implications CPD all staff on central courses.  Implications teacher as researcher elements                                                                                             

SMT and Curric sub com

Later govs  Apr 08 interim findings outcomes to curric sub com.

Performance Management

By End Oct objectives in place

Reviewer selected

Class observations underway

Supply to do joint observations when required

Possible other time for observations if required.

To SIP

SIP programme

Target dates etc

October commencement review

Head Govs and SIP programme

Govs pers cmt

Costs: CPD and release to examine Nat strategy Implications in delivery and planning. PM.  Release time to carry out PM. Reviewer etc  SIP is Head and Governor time.  

Costs: following up PM outcomes in CPD or standards funds

 

SEF 4.  PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AND WELL-BEING                                               

4a To what extent do learners adopt healthy lifestyles? whether learners take adequate physical exercise, and eat and drink healthily;          

-          learners' growing understanding of how to live a healthy lifestyle.

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

SEAL  Implement this new programme

PSHE scheme.  Retain elements from existing PSHE not covered in SEAL.

Health, citizenship etc

Impact of the change

Any other changes required

Curric sub com Sept 07 and then July 08

Revisions for 08-09 curriculum if required.

Healthy school

Healthy school initiative

Sign up for programmes.

Majority already in p[lace.

Gather necessary evidence.

Ensure does not create work but supports school aims.

Consideration by 08, depending on paper and requirements which must be impact on school in reality.

Walk to school

School Travel Plan

Bike IT Sustran

Continue

Encourage more bike use

Gained partnership with

Continue excellent progress

 

Implement and utilize input from group.

All elements

Curric Sub Com April -08.

Reports to July 08

Sports programme

Coaches Dance Drama

External tennis lacrosse etc

Review planning and range of sports being conducted

 

What needs to change

Continue dance and drama, very popular with children  Continue tennis year round and search for other external sources.

April 08 New financial year and impact of budget on.

Costs: Time and training in house to implement SEAL. TLR time to blend PSHE with SEAL.  Healthy school likely costs on implementing unclear.

Last are based on a budget of 10k, dependent on future budgets.                                                     

4b To what extent do learners feel safe and adopt safe practices?

whether learners feel safe from bullying and racist incidents; the extent to which learners have confidence to talk to staff and others when they feel at risk.

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

Review of current school ethos and impact.

Enhance community feel.  Highlight positive.

Illustrate with signage and prompts.

Keeping up with change and setting

Put in place new materials, signage and prompts. School Council friendship stops etc

 

To Govs and school April 08.

Report longer impact Dec 08

Continue and enhance circle time

Current position and value

Its continuing use and effect

Govs

School Council ongoing development and support

Update and give more say and responsibility

Class and school feedback

Maintain and develop role

To staff

Child protection

CAF MAP

Check against new guide lines

Change, update, amend

Head on training so as to access

Updated Sept 07.  Training implications.

Waiting to use.  MAP an issue

Costs:  Signage and prompts to encourage change and to maintain schools community feel.  School is from surveys highly regarded by community in and out.                 

4c How much do learners enjoy their education?

take. account of learners' attitudes, behaviour and attendance; learners' spiritual, moral, social, emotional and cultural development.

4d How well do learners make a positive contribution to the community?

learners' growing understanding of their rights and responsibilities, and of those of others;

how well learners express their views and contribute to communal activities.

4e How well do learners prepare for their future economic well-being?

how well learners develop skills and personal qualities that will enable them to achieve future economic well-being.

 

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

School link development through Comenius Project in Europe.

End of 2nd project 06-07

Year gap and new project to include language link with Spanish School.

Further support and role of children in Children’s input and ideas used

Complete and investigate a further link and if this is practical when set against other aims

Tsunami Project Sri Lanka

 

Outline of their ideas used to inform outcome and support

Further fund raising and information to maintain awareness and the changes we are helping to create

USA    

Hand held project link  Year 1 and Year 5 links as well as Y6 with Lake Charles and Santa Claus Indiana.

Continue VOIP links, prepare materials

Continuing

Charities and Community support

Maintain Poppy appeal and Y2 presenting wreaths to WW1 soldiers from commonwealth in graveyard.

RNLI SOS Appeal.  Harvest and other fund raising from children for charities and causes.

Time and curriculum links planned

Heads report to Governors.

 

Costs: Maintaining International fund from external and internal sources.  Time to bid and to foster relationships with partners.

4g On the basis of your evaluation, what are your key priorities for development

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

SEAL and PHSE programmes

Combining to provide wide ranging programme to take in key elements

To maintain direction and programme

Govs Curric Sub Com

Maintaining International links

New project

Link to lang programme Spanish.

 

Community

 

Maintain successful community programmes, charities etc

 

 

SEF 5a HOW GOOD IS THE QUALITY OF TEACHING AND LEARNING.

How well teaching meets the needs of the full range of learners and course requirements,  the suitability and rigour of assessment

the diagnosis of, and provision for, individual learning needs; the involvement of parents and carers in their children's learning and development.

Issue   

Outline

Action  /Resources

Report

See SEF part 3

Continue with target groups planning and assessment arrangements in place

Staffing costs in budget plans.